Saturday, February 24, 2018

PT -- GUERRA NUCLEAR: 3.7 Acidentes nas centrais nucleares


MANLIO DINUCCI

GUERRA NUCLEAR
O PRIMEIRO DIA
De Hiroshima até hoje:
Quem e como nos conduzem à catástrofe
Sub-capítulo completo:
3.7  Acidentes nas centrais nucleares
Centrais nucleares de Three Mile Island (EUA) e Chernobil (União Soviética)

Friday, February 23, 2018

American Elites Discredited Themselves With Russiagate



American Elites Discredited Themselves With Russiagate
American Elites Discredited Themselves With Russiagate

Professor Stephen Cohen points out that by continuing to hype the disproven Russiagate theory, the Democrats and presstitutes have 
(1) endangered the institution of the US presidency, 
(2) threatened US national security by accusing Russia of “an act of war,” 
(3) demeaned American voters, 
(4) discredited the US media as a source of honest information, 
(5) turned the Democratic Party into a party that seeks power by promoting conspiracy theories, and 
(6) revealed American elites to be people short of integrity and personal honor.

Does the ACLU Any Longer Defend Civil Liberty? Paul Craig Roberts


Does the ACLU Any Longer Defend Civil Liberty?


Does the ACLU Any Longer Defend Civil Liberty?
Paul Craig Roberts
There are many signs of American collapse. One of the most scary is the fact that the American Civil Liberties Union no longer knows what are the civil liberties it purports to defend. Identity Politics has transformed civil rights into privileges for victim groups.
Yesterday (February 22, 2018) I received a 50-state survey from the ACLU. The envelop in which the questionnaire arrived said the survey was about how “to protect civil liberties during the Trump Presidency.” However, the survey (essentially a fundraiser) did not mention a single civil liberty contained in the Bill of Rights and added as amendments to the US Constitution.
Nothing about the sweeping away by the criminal Bush regime of habeas corpus with indefinite detention. No mention of the criminal Obama regime’s kill list, which swept away due process by executing US citizens on allegation alone without trial, evidence, and conviction. Nothing about the sweeping away by both criminal regimes of the prohibition against spying on citizens without warrants. No mention of the shutdown of free speech and protest or of the destruction of civil liberties by unaccountable police who brutalize, rob, and murder Americans at will.
In place of civil liberties, the ACLU has Identity Politics. The ACLU “civil rights” survey is concerned with the civil rights of illegal aliens, of women to have abortions and publicly financed birth control, the “fundamental rights of LGBT people,” and Muslim bans. The civil liberties listed in the Constitution do not qualify for concern; only invented rights that are not listed in the Bill of Rights.
The letter accompanying the questionaire does mention the First Amendment and suppression of free speech “emanating from the White House.” I mean, really, the Bush and Obama regimes decimated free speech and imprisoned whistleblowers. Julian Assange has been imprisoned for years in the Ecuadoran embassy in London for publishing leaked material revealing criminal and deceitful behavior of the US government. By the time of Trump’s election, the First Amendment was a dead letter civil right.
In the ACLU’s Identity Politics, white people, especially white heterosexual males, have no rights. They are not protected by quotas, political correctness, or hate speech prohibitions. No one has to worry about offending a white by destroying statures of white males or church plaques commendorating George Washington and Robert E. Lee. Try destroying a stature of Martin Luther King. A white person can be called every name in the book, and is. White DNA is said to be an abomination. Anyone who said black DNA or homosexual DNA was an abomination would face hate crime charges.
Even men-hating white feminists jump on the anti-white bandwaggon, denouncing white heterosexual–not homosexual–males as misogynist. The feminists reserve their hate for the men attracted to women.
War is the greatest destroyer of civil liberty. Indefinite detention, execution without due process, spying without warrants, suppression of the First Amendment are all consequences of the use of 9/11 to put the US on a war basis. The replacement of civil liberty with a police state is said to be necessary in order to protect us from Muslim terrorists, expanded to include undefined “domestic extremists.” Currently the US is being put on an even greater war basis with Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, and even Venezuela declared as threats to America.
The ACLU shares responsibility for the explosion of the threat level from al Qaeda to every country that “threatens” America by having its own independent foreign policy and insisting on its sovereignty. It was Trump who said he was going to normalize relations with Russia, and it was the ACLU and the entirety of the liberal/progressive/left who jumped on the anti-Trump bandwaggon and went after him with the orchestrated conspiracy of Russiagate. What the liberal/progressive/left did was to drive Trump into the arms of the military/security complex.
Clearly, the liberal/progressive/left and the ACLU are a greater menace to the Bill of Rights than Donald Trump.

PT -- GUERRA NUCLEAR: 3.6 A ligação entre o nuclear militar e civil






MANLIO DINUCCI

GUERRA NUCLEAR
O PRIMEIRO DIA
De Hiroshima até hoje:
Quem e como nos conduzem à catástrofe



3.6  A ligação entre o nuclear militar e civil

Já em 1943, no decurso do projecto Manhattan, descobre-se que o reactor nuclear, com que se produz o plutónio para a bomba de Nagasaki, produz energia térmica que poderia ser convertida em energia eléctrica. Torna-se evidente aos generais e aos governantes, a vantagem de construir centrais nucleares civis que, enquanto produzem energia eléctrica, podem fornecer plutónio e outros materiais físseis para uso militar e, ao mesmo tempo, amortizar os custos através da energia eléctrica produzida.

Paradigmático, é o facto, de que o anúncio do futuro nascimento da indústria nuclear ter sido feito, imediatamente após o primeiro uso militar de energia nuclear, com o bombardeamento de Hiroshima: «A energia atómica – escreve o Presidente Truman na Declaração de 6 de Agosto de 1945  - poderia, no futuro, fornecer a energia que agora provém do carvão, do petróleo e da água, mas que no estado actual não pode ser produzida numa base comercialmente competitiva». A primeira energia electronuclear surge produzida experimentalmente nos Estados Unidos, em 1951 e, três anos depois, também na União Soviética.

Em 8 de Dezembro de 1953, o Presidente dos Estados Unidos, Dwight D. Eisenhower pronuncia, na Assembleia Geral das Nações Unidas, o discurso «Átomos para a Paz». Antes de tudo, ele salienta que «o arsenal de bombas atómicas dos Estados Unidos, o qual aumenta mais a cada dia e supera, muitas vezes, o equivalente a todas as bombas e a todos os projécteis, aviões e canhões em todos os teatros bélicos, durante todos os anos da Segunda Guerra Mundial». Mas, acrescenta, «o terrível segredo e os aterradores instrumentos da potência atómica não pertencem só a nós.» De facto, a União Soviética realizou a sua primeira explosão nuclear experimental em 1949, e a Grã-Bretanha em 1952.

Ler mais em
https://nowarnonato.blogspot.pt/2018/02/pt-guerra-nuclear-36-ligacao-entre-o.html


Thursday, February 22, 2018

PT -- GUERRA NUCLEAR: 3.5 O inquinamento radioactivo dos testes e das instalações nucleares – Parte 2






MANLIO DINUCCI

GUERRA NUCLEAR
O PRIMEIRO DIA
De Hiroshima até hoje:
Quem e como nos conduzem à catástrofe



3.5  O inquinamento radioactivo dos testes e das instalações nucleares 
 Parte 2


A morrer devido aos testes nucleares também estão as divas de Hollywood. Em 1954, a firma cinematográfica, RKO decide realizar um filme sobre Gengis Khan, The Conqueror, dirigido por Dick Powell e interpretado por John Wayne e Susan Hayward. Na impossibilidade de filmá-lo na Mongólia, sendo o período da guerra fria, o grupo de artistas vai para o deserto do Utah, a pouco mais de 150 km do polígono do Nevada onde ocorrem testes nucleares. Permanecem aí durante três meses e, regressando a Hollywood, levam do Utah, 60 toneladas de areia do deserto para tornar mais realísticas, as cenas a filmadas nos estúdios. Nos anos seguintes, 91 dos 220 membros da troupe são atingidos por vários carcinomas. Mesmo que a causa não seja oficialmente reconhecida, o Departamento de Biologia da Universidade de Utah conclui, depois de ter estudado o caso, que a causa a provocar na troupe uma tão alta incidência de mortes pelo cancro não podia ser outra senão o fallout dos testes nucleares do Nevada.

Ler mais em

 PF. rolar a página até encontrar Parte 2


DE -- Manlio Dinucci -- Die Kunst des Krieges!: Die NATO hat bereits vor uns gestimmt!

Resultado de imagem para pictures of Schengen zone

We need volunteer translators for these languages

AL, DE, BG, HR, DK, SK, SI, EE, GR, NL, HU, ISL, LT, LU, NO, PL, CZ, TR, RU, ZH
Contact:



Die Kunst des Krieges!

 Die NATO hat bereits vor uns gestimmt!

 Manlio Dinucci

Es gibt eine Partei, die, auch wenn sie nicht erscheint, an den Wahlen in Italien teilnimmt: die NATO-Partei. Sie wird von einer transversalen Mehrheit gebildet, die ausdrücklich oder stillschweigend die Mitgliedschaft Italiens in der Großen Allianz unter US-Kommando unterstützt. 

Dies erklärt, warum auf dem Höhepunkt des Wahlkampfes die Hauptparteien stillschweigend die zusätzlichen, von den 29 NATO-Verteidigungsministern (für Italien Roberta Pinotti), am 14.-15. Februar in Brüssel beschlossenen Verpflichtungen akzeptiert haben. Die Minister nahmen zuerst an der Nato-Nuklear-Planungsgruppe unter dem Vorsitz der Vereinigten Staaten teil, deren Entscheidungen immer streng geheim sind, danach trafen sich die Minister auf dem Level der Nord-Atlantik Berater. Zwei Stunden später kündigten sie wichtige Entscheidungen an (die bereits anderswo getroffen wurden), um die NATO - Befehlsstruktur, das Rückgrat unseres Bündnisses, zu modernisieren. 

Es wird ein neues, gemeinsames Einsatzkommando für den Atlantik geschaffen, wahrscheinlich mit Sitz in den Vereinigte Staaten, um die "Meeres-Linien der Kommunikation zwischen Nordamerika und Europa" zu schützen. So erfanden sie das Szenario von Russischen U-Booten, die Handelsschiffe auf den transatlantischen Routen versenken könnten. 

Ein neues Logistik-Kommando, wahrscheinlich in Deutschland gelegen, soll "die Truppenbewegungen für unsere kollektive Verteidigung kontrollieren und die Ausrüstung verbessern". So erfanden sie das Szenario einer NATO, die gezwungen ist, sich vor einem aggressiven Russland zu verteidigen. 

Das Gegenteil ist der Fall! Die NATO errichtet in Europa entlang der Ostgrenzen zu Russland zusätzliche Land-Stützpunkte mit Befehlszentralen, um "die Koordination und schnelle Reaktion unserer Streitkräfte weiter zu verbessern". 

Die NATO wird außerdem ein neues "Cyber"-Einsatz-Zentrum einrichten, um "unsere Verteidigung weiter zu stärken". Es wird in der Zentrale von Mons (Belgien) unter der Leitung des Oberbefehlshabers in Europa, der stets ein vom US-Präsidenten Generalbevollmächtigter der Vereinigten Staaten ist, ansässig sein. 

Die Minister bekräftigten ihr Engagement für eine Erhöhung der Militärausgaben. In den letzten drei Jahren haben die europäischen Staaten und Kanada die Ausgaben insgesamt um 46 Milliarden Dollar erh  öht. Aber das ist erst der Anfang. Ziel ist, dass jedes Mitgliedsland mindestens 2% des BIP (die USA geben 4% aus) einsetzen, um "mehr Bargeld und somit mehr militärische Möglichkeiten" zu haben. 

Die europäischen Länder, die diese Quote bisher erreicht haben, sind: Griechenland (2,32%), Estland, England, Rumänien und Polen. Die Militärausgaben der Europäischen Union müssen komplementär zu denen der NATO sein. Dies wurde in einem Treffen mit der EU-Außenministerin Federica Mogherini bekräftigt. Pinotti bestätigte, dass "Italien die Ausgaben für die Verteidigung erhöht" und "wir werden diesen Weg weitergehen - welcher ein Weg der Verantwortung ist!" 

Der Weg wird deshalb verfolgt. Aber darüber wird im Wahlkampf nicht gesprochen. Während bezüglich Italiens Mitgliedschaft in der Europäischen Union die Hauptparteien unterschiedliche Positionen haben, ist die Zugehörigkeit Italiens zur NATO praktisch einstimmig. Dies verzerrt das ganze Szenario. Wir können nicht über die Europäische Union diskutieren, während wir gleichzeitig ignorieren, dass 21 der 27 EU-Länder (nach dem Brexit), die etwa 90 % der Bevölkerung der Union ausmachen, Mitglieder der NATO unter US-Kommando sind. 

Wir können die politischen und militärischen Konsequenzen - und gleichzeitig auch die wirtschaftlichen, sozialen und kulturellen Folgen - nicht ignorieren. Die NATO macht Europa zu einem Schlachtfeld gegen Russland, dargestellt als ein drohender Feind: das neue "Reich der Rache" attackiert "die größte Demokratie der Welt" von innen mit seiner Armee von Trollen. 


 Il manifesto  - 20. Februar 2018


Übersetzung: Renate Shany`Sha Rehberg


NO WAR NO NATO





Wednesday, February 21, 2018

Russiaphobia Is Out of Control Paul Craig Roberts




Russiaphobia Is Out of Control
Paul Craig Roberts
All Mueller has found is a bait-click commerial marketing scheme that had nothing to do with election interference.
Why is Mueller comfortable bringing a transparently false indictment.
The answer is, as Glenn Greenwald makes clear ( https://theintercept.com/2018/02/19/a-consensus-emerges-russia-committed-an-act-of-war-on-par-with-pearl-harbor-and-911-should-the-u-s-response-be-similar/ ) that Mueller knows there are large numbers of warmongering politicians and media whores who will seize on the fake indictment as proof that Russia has “committed an act of war equilivant to Pearl Harbor and 9/11.” The fact that what Mueller has indicted is only a bait-click marketing scheme will never be mentioned by politicians and presstitutes shouting the military/security complex’s slogan that “Russia must be punished.”
Greenwald supplies the names of some of these reckless and irresponsible people who are willing to bring on war with their rants: politicians Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Jeanne Shaheen, Jerry Nadler, Marco Rubio—indeed almost all of Congress—Clinton aides such as Philippe Reines and John Podesta, and the legions of presstitutes such as Karen Tumulty, David Frum, Chuck Todd, Tom Friedman, Chris Hayes—indeed, the entirety of the print and TV media with the exceptions of Tucker Carlson and Pat Buchanan.
When a country armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons and overwhelmed by its own exceptionialism and indispensability has political and media lunatics equating a bait-click commercial marketing scheme with Pearl Harbor, that country is a recipe for the end of the world.
Note: Two presstitutes at Bloomberg, Lauren Etter and Ilya Arkhipov think that filming disadvantaged Americans in order to cast the US in a bad light is the same as interfering in the presidential election, and they think that a Russian food caterer is heading a Russian disinformation campaign.https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-21/how-putin-s-cook-fed-america-s-appetite-for-disinformation?cmpid=BBD022118_BIZ&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_term=180221&utm_campaign=bloombergdaily
This shows how utterly stupid the US media is. The entire article is based on nothing, just what some people say they think. Prigozhin’s business is a bait-click marketing scheme. What the utterly dishonest Mueller and the presstitutes are doing is turning a bait-click marketing scheme into an election interfering scheme. The only way this “indictment” could succeed in a court would be if no evidence could be presented, only Mueller’s absurd “indictment.”
Mueller’s “indictment” is not meant to go to court. It is just a propaganda device, and that is how the presstitutes are using it.

More from Articles & Columns

PUTIN FRENCH

putin

VLADIMIR SOLOVYOV WORLD ORDER

PRESIDENT

lie we live

pt

xmas





“Glory to God in the highest,

and on Earth

Peace, Good Will toward men.”

This Christmas, Give Peace